Recently, because the Beijing Ministry of Environmental Protection said that it is necessary to refer to the US standards when formulating the Beijing VI emission standards, it caused a big stir in the automotive industry. Everyone expressed different opinions, but many people in the industry said that this is a Progress. It is the trend of China's future emission regulations. In order to give the industry a comprehensive understanding of the US emission standards, the Automotive Engineering Environmental Protection Technology Branch of the China Automotive Engineering Society hosted the "American Motor Vehicle Emission Standards Introduction and Exchange Conference". At the meeting, China A reporter from the Automotive Industry Information Network interviewed Mr. Shuai Shijin, the State Key Laboratory of Automotive Safety and Energy, Tsinghua University. He talked about his views on how to establish an emission standard that suits the national conditions. Solar Damper,Pv Damper,Adjustable Linear Damper,Atv Shock ZHEJIANG ROADTAMER AUTO PARTS INC , https://www.road-tamer.com
The change of thinking is a good start. It is understood that since the implementation of the national I standard in 1999, China has begun to formulate its own emission regulations in accordance with the European standard route. After more than ten years of development, the implementation of emission regulations controls the emission of motor vehicles in China. And China has become a major automobile producing country and has made great progress in technology. Therefore, we should now copy Europe from the original emission technology. Turning to the development of China's oil, road conditions, car conditions, driving habits and other national conditions, after all, we set standards to reduce emissions. At present, our country can't immediately come up with a correct and reasonable emission regulation specifically for China's working conditions, but we have begun to recognize the limitations of the European route only, and are trying to find ways to learn about US emissions regulations. A correct route, this change in thinking is an improvement for our country. It can be said that such a change has brought us closer to the appropriate emission standards.
In this sense, it is a positive solution for Beijing VI to refer to US emission standards, because when a best way out is not found, the compromise is the most secure and effective. After all, it is powerful. Under the pressure of the environment, we have no time to study slowly. We can slowly adjust and share the same rules in the process of studying this country with a similar automobile market structure in China, and constantly improve our laws and regulations. This can be said to be the most realistic and fastest way at present.
The support of technology is the basic condition. Every standard is formulated with solid technical support. For example, in the United States and Europe, at the beginning of each standard, it is inseparable from the technical conditions possessed by the industry. Their Behind the environmental protection department, there is a strong technical team that conducts technical investigations and research for the development of standards. Under such circumstances, the regulations they develop are often consistent with the technical level, and the regulations are in the process of implementation. More convincing, but as far as China is concerned, there is still no support from such a technical team behind China's government departments. In addition, Chinese companies are also lacking in technology, but we can't give up waiting for technology upgrades. The environment for survival, such a contradiction really leaves China in a dilemma. In the final analysis, this is a question of seeking balance. It is a matter of grasping the degree. We cannot take too rush to fight for independent enterprises for the sake of the environment. We must not let the environmental pollution become more and more serious, so we must actively research We can learn from some advanced technologies from abroad, develop our own test cycle, and develop more suitable emission limits. We believe that after 5-8 years of hard work, our company will make great progress in technology, we will With strong technical support, we have established emission regulations that are appropriate for China's national conditions.
Effective regulation is indispensable from the history of US emission standards. The United States has been paying attention to emissions since the Los Angeles smog incident in the 1960s and 1970s. So far, a complete system has been formed, including not only the certification of the standard itself, but also the follow-up OBD. Regulatory technology, which is indispensable in the actual emission control process, is an important part of whether the regulation can be implemented. At present, our country mainly discusses how to introduce more strict and effective laws suitable for China for new cars, and solve the problem of new cars, but in fact, with the increase of vehicles in China, such as the number of cars in Beijing has exceeded 5.5 million. We must strengthen the supervision of existing vehicles. The emissions of certain vehicles are constantly changing with the use conditions and years of use. The supervision and control system for the emission of vehicles is gradually established to achieve the maximum reduction of environmental protection. The effect of this system from scratch is that although it takes a long process, it must be done. After all, this is the key to the effective implementation of emission regulations and the inevitable requirement for reducing emissions.
Collaboration between government, enterprise and research is a powerful push. From the current situation, how to combine the government, enterprises and third-party independent institutions, so that the three parties can study and establish emission regulations that are suitable for China's national conditions in the process of full communication. This requires the establishment of a coordination mechanism, which is led by the government. Enterprises and third-party agencies must also take responsibility to actively participate. The government must not only establish a strict system of laws and regulations to constrain the enterprise, but also give the enterprise an adaptation process, and give certain preferential incentive policies in terms of taxation. After all, as a company, it is mainly profit-oriented, and making money is his first element. This is understandable. In addition, third-party organizations such as industry associations should also shoulder their own responsibilities and actively promote the smooth communication between the government and enterprises, play a role of lubrication and coordination, and work together to promote the progress of the entire industry.