The Great Earthquake in Japan triggered concerns about the safety of nuclear power from all walks of life. It also prompted countries to re-examine nuclear power development strategies. In this regard, the Deputy Minister of Environment of the Ministry of Environmental Protection said: We will learn some lessons from Japan and properly absorb our nuclear power development strategies and development plans. However, our country’s determination to develop nuclear power and the arrangements for the development of nuclear power will not change. Lu Qizhou, member of the National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference and general manager of China Power Investment Corporation, stated that the nuclear power plant in Japan is a second-generation nuclear power technology. China’s third-generation nuclear power technology does not have this problem. China’s nuclear power technology is not afraid of earthquakes. Needless to say, for the safety of nuclear power, the general public is an absolute layman; we see only terrible consequences, and then we can't help but think about the association that occurred when the disaster happened. Although people do not quite understand that the government’s determination and arrangements for nuclear power will “do not change,†how government departments will “draw lessons from Japanâ€; but the public is absolutely aware that when disasters happen to others, they do not pay attention and wait until It was too late for disaster to happen to yourself. For our country, which is rapidly developing nuclear power, nuclear safety is obviously an unavoidable topic. In the 2007 Nuclear Power Medium and Long Term Development Plan (2005-2020), the installed nuclear power capacity in 2020 will be 40 million kilowatts. According to the “New Energy Industry Development Plan†awaiting the approval of the State Council, this figure will be rewritten as 86 million kilowatts. Previously, how to deal with very dangerous nuclear waste, and who would pay for the staggering cost of disposing of nuclear waste, have caused concern among relevant experts; now, the nuclear crisis caused by the Great Japan Earthquake made it even more visible to all the people behind the clean nuclear power. The other side of horror. I think this is a normal reflection of normality: When we look at the nuclear crisis that occurred in other countries, the most needed emotion for people to resolve is: How can we prevent nuclear power from developing at the same time? Especially those residents living in the vicinity of nuclear power plants, they will inevitably produce resistance and the nuclear crisis triggered by the earthquake in Japan as a practical example; and this, I am afraid not "will learn from Japan", "China's nuclear power technology without fear "Response to earthquakes" can be easily eliminated. In a sense, "it will learn from Japan's lessons" and "China's nuclear power technology without fear of earthquakes" will even be self-contradictory: Since our nuclear power technology has no fear of an earthquake, but also learn what Japan's behind the nuclear power technology lessons? Of course, they are more likely to be two different ways of expressing the same meaning, but the former is euphemistic and the latter is straightforward. However, just as humans are destined to be very small in the face of major earthquakes and tsunami, the relative backwardness of technology is simply inevitable in the face of the unknown risks that may trigger a nuclear crisis. In the face of unknown nuclear power risks, we should at least maintain the "I know that I am ignorant," rather than the complacency of "no fear of earthquakes." Whether or not the third-generation nuclear power technology is really advanced to the level of "no fear of earthquakes," the public is obviously less confident than the experts. In the face of the interests of nuclear power development and the safety of nuclear power, the nuclear crisis in other countries is also a profound reminder. To this end, government departments' research and attitudes should be cautious, serious, and serious. There is a short story saying that when Premier Wen visited the Three Gorges Project, he asked the person in charge who contributed the most. The person in charge replied: “The most important contributions are made by several academicians who put forward the opinion of “infeasibility,†and they’re not feasible. Sex's analysis and arguments have enabled us to avoid a number of major mistakes in the construction of the project and ultimately ensure the smooth implementation of the project.†In view of this, the great earthquake in Japan and the resulting public worries may not necessarily become impossible. An important asset for the development of China's nuclear power; the key to it lies in how we face and use it. casting & foundry,sand casting foundry,iron casting foundry,die cast foundry Huiye Hardware & Electrical Equipment Company Ltd. , https://www.jmhuiyehardware.com